From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jul  3 13:36:57 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 223D01065670
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue,  3 Jul 2012 13:36:57 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from feld@feld.me)
Received: from feld.me (unknown [IPv6:2607:f4e0:100:300::2])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E01428FC18
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue,  3 Jul 2012 13:36:56 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me;
	s=blargle; 
	h=In-Reply-To:Message-Id:From:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Date:References:Subject:To:Content-Type;
	bh=ev292ud0TUAVvCxrrTnzPPuCp7WTS/stb6ECMbXsVfI=; 
	b=JUq3OBAyx20L2eDavaSoVBQMW/n2bAvL7pvY1aDzk1muhUDndu2hPUGT2B72DuxMGA9IcPzppkqZjKrd8sOxa5tmUAFBFVunc6oYXY55pqOXcid7JX3g6FDR7vsiQfVT;
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org)
	by feld.me with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD))
	(envelope-from <feld@feld.me>) id 1Sm3Hj-00066z-Ag
	for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 08:36:56 -0500
Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.4)
	with esmtpa id 1341322609-94480-94479/5/82; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 13:36:49
	+0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
References: <CA+QLa9B-Dm-=hQCrbEgyfO4sKZ5aG72_PEFF9nLhyoy4GRCGrA@mail.gmail.com>
	<4FF2E00E.2030502@FreeBSD.org> <86bojxow6x.fsf@ds4.des.no>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 08:36:45 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Mark Felder <feld@feld.me>
Message-Id: <op.wgvhfja234t2sn@tech304>
In-Reply-To: <86bojxow6x.fsf@ds4.des.no>
User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.00 (FreeBSD)
X-SA-Score: -1.5
Subject: Re: Pull in upstream before 9.1 code freeze?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 13:36:57 -0000

On Tue, 03 Jul 2012 07:39:34 -0500, Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav <des@des.no>=
 wrote:

>
> I don't think there will be as much whinging as you expect.  Times have
> changed.

Agreed; if we need DNS in base (really, why?) then unbound+nsd are prime =
=20
candidates, but they're healthily maintained in ports...soo... no real =20
advantage.