From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 18 21:26:36 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CF871065670 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 21:26:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomek.cedro@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 792058FC19 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 21:26:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkbc12 with SMTP id c12so2312862bkb.13 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:26:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=JxdDGcC8WLO00XvsRx4SrMAt9VtysDOXH/a9d93+ms8=; b=gDlgG98wHMlKhGiJqHt0KWnsvX0zH8bzX3oZOdHRKnJYcqB4gkgycoEcK4tfLcyAN8 QHCU1NE5SeV2usPDcrH7kzJYRXpUKbmyoOXCNpuQkfz2cntmA/LGSoYERs/BJST5H+S7 dEZzA/MwnPK5qiOWE08+kHa26aKCc9yATaxcc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.156.83 with SMTP id v19mr9349371bkw.40.1326921993283; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:26:33 -0800 (PST) Sender: tomek.cedro@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.149.198 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:26:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201201182118.q0ILIYaq079339@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <201201182118.q0ILIYaq079339@freefall.freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 21:26:33 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: mR3J2PyMFxCN7wqwRM7gaTcQ2IE Message-ID: From: CeDeROM To: delphij@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: misc/164290: FreeBSD 9.0 IS NOT YET PRODUCTION/STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 21:26:36 -0000 On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:18 PM, wrote: > Synopsis: FreeBSD 9.0 IS NOT YET PRODUCTION/STABLE > I'm closing this PR because it does not contain any details about the > hardware nor have any proposal about how to deal with the problem. > > Please, become an active participant of the project by downloading and > testing the images when we are doing BETA and RCs, and shout out loudly > if you hit some bugs and these problems gets addressed. > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=164290 Then simply call for testing, work more on making it stable, and when its stable mark it stable. The logical consequence of releasing unstable as production is to lie to users. New people that install 9.0 release/stable that even won't install will never look at this system again, the changes instroduced in 9.0 makes even me want to switch to another os :-( -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info