From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Feb 10 01:32:06 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA18192
          for current-outgoing; Tue, 10 Feb 1998 01:32:06 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA18187
          for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 10 Feb 1998 01:32:05 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.6.9) with ESMTP id BAA05771; Tue, 10 Feb 1998 01:31:48 -0800 (PST)
To: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>
cc: jbryant@unix.tfs.net, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: merging win95 and nt filesystem changes into msdosfs 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 10 Feb 1998 09:29:22 GMT."
             <199802100929.CAA24285@usr05.primenet.com> 
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 01:31:48 -0800
Message-ID: <5767.887103108@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> > > If the FS framework were logically layered to eliminate upcalls and
> > > make all VOP's reflexive, I would be willing to take on this task.
> > 
> > Translation: "No."  :-)
> 
> Translation: "Jordan should give me the same benefit of the doubt as
> he gives to complete strangers".

I think you misread that one.  Consider the odds of "the FS framework
being logically layered to eliminate upcalls and make all VOP's
reflexive" as a prerequisite and you'll see the accuracy of my
translation emerge. :)

					Jordan

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe current" in the body of the message