From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Sep 8 21:22:44 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81D2A37B42C; Fri, 8 Sep 2000 21:22:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id VAA03690; Fri, 8 Sep 2000 21:22:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: kris owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2000 21:22:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway To: Will Andrews Cc: Neil Blakey-Milner , Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami , FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: Ports Options Paper In-Reply-To: <20000908230629.I632@radon.gryphonsoft.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, 8 Sep 2000, Will Andrews wrote: > On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 08:53:48PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > The libraries have different names (libqt vs libqt2). If you want one, you > > use libqt.*, or libqt.[3-5] or whatever, if you want the other you use > > libqt2.*, if you want either, you use libqt{,2}.* > ^ > > > I don't see the problem. > > Where will that number come from? Err, when you have a port which works with qt2, you add it in. If qt2 is different enough to qt that it should be considered a separate package, then you have to deal with it separately. I dont see how this stuff can be made to work automatically. Kris -- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message