From owner-freebsd-advocacy Wed Jul 14 15: 9:56 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from lariat.lariat.org (lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13BEE14E1C; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 15:09:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from mustang.lariat.org (IDENT:ppp0.lariat.org@lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by lariat.lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA00347; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 16:09:18 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.19990714160756.046fdbf0@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 16:09:14 -0600 To: Alex Zepeda From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: NT vs Linux vs FreeBSD Cc: Wes Peters , Lanny Baron , cjclark@home.com, Paul Anderson , ulairi@jps.net, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG, advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: References: <4.2.0.58.19990714142755.04765a40@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 02:46 PM 7/14/99 -0700, Alex Zepeda wrote: >You don't get the same programs, libraries or configuration files at all. >For instance Caldera includes KDE, Qt, a Qt based installer and IIRC >system configuration tool Caldera also has different tools for package >management. RedHat does not; RedHat is also available for non x86 >platforms. As I understand it, by Wes's criteria, this wouldn't count because Linux itself came from the same CVS tree. --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message