From owner-cvs-all Sat Jan 23 11:10:25 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA04479 for cvs-all-outgoing; Sat, 23 Jan 1999 11:10:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA04467 for ; Sat, 23 Jan 1999 11:10:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by alpo.whistle.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA27690; Sat, 23 Jan 1999 11:05:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from s204m82.isp.whistle.com(207.76.204.82) via SMTP by alpo.whistle.com, id smtpdl27688; Sat Jan 23 19:05:32 1999 Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 11:05:27 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer X-Sender: julian@s204m82.isp.whistle.com To: Nate Williams cc: Archie Cobbs , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Problem with "cvs" on freefall (fwd In-Reply-To: <199901231754.KAA26595@mt.sri.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Sat, 23 Jan 1999, Nate Williams wrote: > > At work we use CVS exensively, and we've had 'strange' problems using > CVS 1.10 on repositories built with CVS 1.9 when mixing different > versions of the cvs binary. (The remote version is different from the > local version, etc...) > > I'm not (yet) convinced that CVS 1.10 is ready for use in mixed > environments, and since CVS 1.9 is the default FreeBSD version, I > wouldn't switch. We're not suggesting switching just recompiling it from source and reinstallign it on freefall. The same verrsion that's there already but there are some bugfixes that have been committed and it's odd that our own central CVS machine hasn't been updated. > julian > > Nate > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message