From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 25 22:24:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFFFB1065670; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 22:24:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomek.cedro@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37C798FC15; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 22:24:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkbc12 with SMTP id c12so6516474bkb.13 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 14:24:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=UG6JEyjNxFuDGQtc/1ixZmujlfrTm29s3+S2SeUj2ug=; b=BxHxrY2haG1cTf2x4jIyeKAt637v+g7KFqZ7vxl6IyWXH2FFQSLKN6Tp3FFb3WddkX UjeH+5UsVuu/66o3h8ZUovRNvS5AdLiJtMt7yywa1vVcYUTA77C6n5lR+eUXsI1tvJTa bZoE/lWYg0Sjb4CQ3Z8KtFQBGDv7LpSJPrJ0k= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.151.218 with SMTP id d26mr5201613bkw.64.1327530294970; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 14:24:54 -0800 (PST) Sender: tomek.cedro@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.71.8 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 14:24:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20120118231438.GF372@lonesome.com> References: <201201182118.q0ILIYaq079339@freefall.freebsd.org> <4F173ADE.5030606@delphij.net> <20120118231438.GF372@lonesome.com> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 22:24:54 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: skz590xz9vrdOrq65RgM_ePCTC0 Message-ID: From: CeDeROM To: Mark Linimon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: delphij@freebsd.org, freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org, d@delphij.net Subject: Re: misc/164290: FreeBSD 9.0 IS NOT YET PRODUCTION/STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 22:24:57 -0000 On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Mark Linimon wrote= : > sysinstall was an absolute bitch to maintain, and people have been > demanding more modern features for it for years. =C2=A0Atttempt after > attempt has been made to rewrite or update it, all of which have been > abandoned up until now. > (...) Hello Mark and thank you for your explanations it gives me a better overview why things were changed and I accept that.. maybe except new things does not have old good functionalities which are important from user perspective :-) Is there a chance that installation ISO will be updated with new version of bsdinstall that already can install over existing filesystem or any new features, or installation ISO are frozen and cannot change until next release? Thank you and best regards, Tomek --=20 CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info