Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2010 15:36:00 +0100 From: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> To: "Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk@queernet.org> Cc: "esra_peranginangin@yahoo.com" <esra_peranginangin@yahoo.com>, "questions@freebsd.org" <questions@freebsd.org>, Robert Bonomi <bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com> Subject: Re: Just want to ask Message-ID: <AANLkTikLmOlqkpYEM83WpssU50lzuhNrlmMH-owRAhf1@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <D07E4372-2718-4D8A-8349-6647899E2491@queernet.org> References: <201006291638.o5TGckAJ005459@mail.r-bonomi.com> <4C2A37D6.2060506@infracaninophile.co.uk> <D07E4372-2718-4D8A-8349-6647899E2491@queernet.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 29 June 2010 19:18, Roger B.A. Klorese <rogerk@queernet.org> wrote: > On Jun 29, 2010, at 11:13 AM, Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> wrote: >> >> Whether or not he agrees with them is a matter of philosophical interest >> only, so long as he keeps to the terms. > > Agree TO them, not agree WITH them. _______________________________________________ As I remember, agree _to_ is valid only when followed by a verb infinitive (which is indeed where the `to' comes from); I agree to abide by these terms. -- and -- I agree with these terms. Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTikLmOlqkpYEM83WpssU50lzuhNrlmMH-owRAhf1>