Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 3 Nov 2004 14:26:15 +0300
From:      Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru>
To:        Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Recent TTYDEF_LFLAG default change
Message-ID:  <20041103112615.GA13218@nagual.pp.ru>
In-Reply-To: <16246.1099480832@critter.freebsd.dk>
References:  <20041103111813.GB13047@nagual.pp.ru> <16246.1099480832@critter.freebsd.dk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 12:20:32PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >Well, use TTYDEF_LFLAG_NOECHO I suggest for that case and leave 
> >user-visible default untouched to not break userland programs.
> 
> How many pieces of software know about TTYDEF_* outside our sourcecode ?
> 
> Most of it would be bogus I think, software should record the current
> state and restore that, not mangle it with defaults.

Some tty/pty-emulators can (in spirit of screen). It is not ours, it is 
common BSD thing. Better to not make surprises and harden porter's job 
here, really, without a reason. Inside kernel you can do anything you want 
using TTYDEF_LFLAG_NOECHO.

-- 
http://ache.pp.ru/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041103112615.GA13218>