From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 11 18:31:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3792E16A4CE; Sat, 11 Sep 2004 18:31:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ebb.errno.com (ebb.errno.com [66.127.85.87]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04C6D43D45; Sat, 11 Sep 2004 18:31:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sam@errno.com) Received: from [66.127.85.89] ([66.127.85.89]) (authenticated bits=0) by ebb.errno.com (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i8BIVWWi015991 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 11 Sep 2004 11:31:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sam@errno.com) In-Reply-To: <20040911182507.C4E9816A4D2@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20040911182507.C4E9816A4D2@hub.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Sam Leffler Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 11:31:37 -0700 To: wpaul@FreeBSD.org (Bill Paul) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: Ruslan Ermilov cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc devd.conf src/sys/modules Makefilesrc/sys/modules/vge Makefile src/sys/dev/vge if_vge.c if_vgereg.hif_ X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 18:31:33 -0000 On Sep 11, 2004, at 11:25 AM, Bill Paul wrote: >>> It's "ok." I only have a 33Mhz/32-bit PCI sample card. When I tested >>> it, I only got it up to about 540Mbps. I attribute some of this to >>> 5.3-BETA3's (lack of) performance. :( I was only able to get about >>> 120000 frames/sec transmit frame rate out of it, which disappointed >>> me. (It should be closer to 400000, especially on a dual PIII 1.2Ghz >>> system.) >>> >> Did you also test in polling mode? > > Someone cleverly fixed it so that DEVICE_POLLING doesn't work with SMP. > And I used an SMP system for testing. So no. As discussed many times, DEVICE_POLLING in its present form makes no sense for SMP systems. You can always boot a UP kernel on an SMP machine. Sam