Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 15 Jan 2004 01:08:18 +1100
From:      Tim Robbins <tjr@freebsd.org>
To:        Don Lewis <truckman@freebsd.org>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: simplifying linux_emul_convpath()
Message-ID:  <20040114140818.GA15471@cat.robbins.dropbear.id.au>
In-Reply-To: <200401141308.i0ED8p7E039161@gw.catspoiler.org>
References:  <200401141308.i0ED8p7E039161@gw.catspoiler.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 05:08:51AM -0800, Don Lewis wrote:

> I just stumbled across a vnode locking violation in
> linux_emul_convpath().  Rather than locking and unlocking each vnode for
> the VOP_GETATTR() calls, is there any reason that this code should not
> be simplified to just compare the vnode pointers rather than fetching
> the vnode attributes and comparing the attributes for equality.

I'm having trouble convincing myself that comparing vnode pointers
would work with stackable filesystems. Then again, null_getattr()
changes va_fsid, so linux_emul_convpath() may not handle stacking
properly right now anyway.


Tim



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040114140818.GA15471>