From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 28 21:50:52 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1F4016A4CF for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 21:50:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from zixvpm01.seton.org (zixvpm01.seton.org [207.193.126.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE68A43D5D for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 21:50:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mgrooms@seton.org) Received: from zixvpm01.seton.org (ZixVPM [127.0.0.1]) by Outbound.seton.org (Proprietary) with ESMTP id 868FF3600AA for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 15:50:51 -0600 (CST) Received: from smtp-out.seton.org (unknown [10.21.254.249]) by zixvpm01.seton.org (Proprietary) with ESMTP id 3E67E330061; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 15:50:51 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-out.seton.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 322338014E24; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 15:50:51 -0600 (CST) Received: from smtp-out.seton.org ([10.21.254.249]) by localhost (mail [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 25641-03; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 15:50:51 -0600 (CST) Received: from ausexfe02.seton.org (ausexfe02.seton.org [10.20.10.185]) by smtp-out.seton.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22ABC8014E23; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 15:50:51 -0600 (CST) Received: from [10.20.160.190] ([10.20.160.190]) by ausexfe02.seton.org with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Mon, 28 Feb 2005 15:50:51 -0600 Message-ID: <4223931C.9000607@seton.org> Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 15:54:36 -0600 From: Matthew Grooms Organization: Seton Healthcare Network User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Max Laier References: <200502282232.17646.max@love2party.net> In-Reply-To: <200502282232.17646.max@love2party.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Feb 2005 21:50:51.0038 (UTC) FILETIME=[91C3FBE0:01C51DDF] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at seton.org cc: Gleb Smirnoff cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: pf + pfsync + carp testing ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter (pf) List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 21:50:52 -0000 Max & Gleb, The tag I used for cvsup is RELENG_5 in my cvsup file. I did not notice any output that denoted a merge conflict at the time. When I view the sbin/ifconfig directory the only files I see are ... Makefile ifconfig.8 ifconfig.c ifconfig.h ifieee80211.c ifmac.c ifmedia.c ifvlan.c If there was a 'hunk in there' from a merge conflict, would it be expressed as one of these file names or would it be stored somewhere else? I apologize for my unfamiliarity with cvs as I use subversion myself. Svn creates . file names when it hits a conflict. I assume cvs does something similar. Is the ifconfig change part of the patch located at ... http://people.freebsd.org/~glebius/totest/carp-RELENG_5-patch ... as I have not applied it yet. I assumed the pfsync ifconfig changes were already in the RELENG_5 branch. Did I make a poor assumption? Matthew Grooms Network Engineer Seton Healthcare Network mgrooms@seton.org (512) 324 9913 Max Laier wrote: > Matthew, > > I am forwarding your mail to Glebius. The errormessage indicates that your > ifconfig is not up-to-date or that something went wrong with the patch in > sbin/ifconfig. Check for rejected hunks in there. > > ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- > > Subject: pf + pfsync + carp testing ... > Date: Monday 28 February 2005 22:31 > From: Matthew Grooms > To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org > Cc: max@love2party.net > > All, > > I am trying to run some tests on CARP under 5.x and plan to use > the patch set recently announced by max to do so ... > > http://people.freebsd.org/~glebius/totest/carp-RELENG_5-patch > > To test the patched I first set up two boxes, cvsup'd to the latest 5.x > sources, make build/install/world/kernel and configured a simple pf > environment. However, when I get to the point where I configure my > pfsync interfaces to sync state, I am getting ... > > >ifconfig pfsync0 up syncif em5 > > syncif: bad value > > Should this be the case or did I miss something? Thanks. > > Matthew Grooms > > ------------------------------------------------------- >