From owner-freebsd-advocacy Fri May 22 11:08:06 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA09121 for freebsd-advocacy-outgoing; Fri, 22 May 1998 11:08:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from idiom.com (idiom.com [140.174.82.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA09027; Fri, 22 May 1998 11:07:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from billy@idiom.com) Received: from localhost (billy@localhost) by idiom.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with SMTP id LAA03084; Fri, 22 May 1998 11:07:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 22 May 1998 11:07:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Billy Thompson To: Frank Pawlak cc: freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD A Solution For Business In-Reply-To: <980522043451.ZM3627@darkstar.connect.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I think what is absolutely necessary to this would be a graph comparison between Win NT and FreeBSD. Start with a lite load then keep pushing it up until both systems are crawling. This would demostrate not only how reliable FreeBSD is on the SAME hardware, but also how much better it is (since I'm sure there will be obviously better performance from FreeBSD). Then plaster this on as many websites as you can and include it in the business solutions document. You know how much pointy haired bosses love graphs and charts, and this should show them in simple terms that FreeBSD has better preformance and is more reliable. -billy To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message