Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 12:30:59 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Using Subversion for binary distribution? Message-ID: <f36dta$re0$1@sea.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <20070525074925.GA19294@uk.tiscali.com> References: <20070525074925.GA19294@uk.tiscali.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigE031E4D35D58554BE7A51B6D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Brian Candler wrote: > Here's a wacky idea - I don't know if anyone's considered it before. >=20 > Suppose you checked a full *binary* FreeBSD distribution into Subversio= n > (that is, untar all the distribution bundles and then svn import) > Is there any value in pursuing this idea? Unless performance problems arise when there are several versions of the = ~~300 MB tree (for the base system) in the repository, this is actually=20 a nice idea! --------------enigE031E4D35D58554BE7A51B6D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGVrrqldnAQVacBcgRAq8DAKCg3vOgtp1tSDSzKaKTExtK/B5pawCgmE58 b8h7VO/bcYyIgElhY6mJzys= =cni/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigE031E4D35D58554BE7A51B6D--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?f36dta$re0$1>