From owner-freebsd-chat Mon Apr 10 5:13:46 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from sasami.jurai.net (sasami.jurai.net [63.67.141.99]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F9EC37B8BE for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 05:13:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mellon@jurai.net) Received: (from mellon@localhost) by sasami.jurai.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) id IAA76330; Mon, 10 Apr 2000 08:13:41 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 08:13:41 -0400 From: Anatoly Vorobey To: David Kelly Cc: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Legal Comprehension (was: Re: ksh ?) Message-ID: <20000410081341.A76278@sasami.jurai.net> References: <200004080358.WAA18525@nospam.hiwaay.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <200004080358.WAA18525@nospam.hiwaay.net>; from dkelly@hiwaay.net on Fri, Apr 07, 2000 at 10:58:02PM -0500 X-Disclaimer: I was young, I needed the money! Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org You, David Kelly, were spotted writing this on Fri, Apr 07, 2000 at 10:58:02PM -0500: > > If I was Dictator Of The World I'd leave the President and Congress to > do the dirty work but the first Order I'd impose would be, "You can > pass no new law unless the President can score 70% on an exam based on > that law." The simple idea being if a professional lawmaker doesn't > understand 70% of the new law then there is no hope of a citizen ever > understanding well enough to comply. But is the President a lawmaker? I thought he was a professional law breaker^H^H^H^H^H^H^Henforcer and, err, vetoer... Maybe you should require the Congress to take the exam and the law would only pass if >=70% members pass the exam... -- Anatoly Vorobey, mellon@pobox.com http://pobox.com/~mellon/ "Angels can fly because they take themselves lightly" - G.K.Chesterton To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message