From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jul 23 19:19:23 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-office@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6B521065703;
	Mon, 23 Jul 2012 19:19:23 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from hammer.pct.niksun.com (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72BC08FC16;
	Mon, 23 Jul 2012 19:19:23 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <500DA3BA.30604@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 15:19:22 -0400
From: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
	rv:13.0) Gecko/20120626 Thunderbird/13.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-office@freebsd.org
References: <500D91AA.70502@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <500D91AA.70502@FreeBSD.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] LibreOffice build issues
X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD <freebsd-office.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-office>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-office-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-office>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-office@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-office-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-office>,
	<mailto:freebsd-office-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 19:19:24 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2012-07-23 14:02:18 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> Over the weekend, I have tried various environments to build 
> LibreOffice.  Basically, it is really tricky to do the right thing
> in 7 and 8 branches.
> 
> devel/boost-libs in ports tree (1.48) is newer than bundled one 
> (1.44).  Unfortunately, Boost 1.48 has various issues in C++98
> mode. That's why LibreOffice had to be built with C++11 mode in the
> first place.  Alas, C++11 support for libstdc++ in the base system
> doesn't exist and 7 & 8 is worse than 9, I think.  The only way to
> build it cleanly for me on 7.4 and 8.2 was with bundled Boost +
> base GCC in default mode[1] (but I believe you may experience
> run-time problems). llvm/clang/binutils combo from ports may be
> able to build it[2] but I don't think we can guarantee its
> correctness.
> 
> So, I am stuck here.  What do we do now? :-(
> 
> Jung-uk Kim
> 
> [1] devel/boost-libs had to be removed first because it is
> *always* picked up first with "-I/usr/local/include" in the
> CXXFLAGS.
...

I found a solution for this specific problem.  We can add CPPFLAGS to
CONFIGURE_ENV, rather than directly define it in the port Makefile,
not to pick up random files from ${LOCALBASE}/include or ${LOCALBASE}/lib.

Jung-uk Kim
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAlANo7oACgkQmlay1b9qnVMcuwCfdtN+qlxBXoErmV6zZXtCKkiz
zzQAoJpEoilNl5QfIG1sIEqQRXplJ9ut
=myCj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----