From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 9 23:50:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 867761065674 for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 23:50:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rysto32@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-f50.google.com (mail-wg0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1562E8FC15 for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 23:50:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbds12 with SMTP id ds12so4755269wgb.31 for ; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 16:50:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=uVnF4sNdvD90Kny0Kvq77RBgY5zjGLPXsxQJewAWUWs=; b=0lWXmbkDG/08oB5EJO/ibENU+DGC3v7dgpUryh0F48JEcmMCp1ZevqXlj1LMZFX0IX 6BndsNy3RyV/Z8nEBFim3oOLyfkgo8AdB3hngB4tzYxh8Gj4T37D+JvhpC2f0pIhcS8c sbv7lQNI/xHAdoHeeLvxPr9tMeCDCWmbyoX5SK3hBldQMH0C8zQBhibPAK2ThbK13qOj 64YThQ2ii/W8DZtY0qntEkziaNpn8XKSJLJ+r5ug7RJHDuH39bC99QbVU5Qiso1bkssy Wr9NmNbBrHI03EH4WU2grl/cnBaP62wWRnwcJjpqVy6wOugdzviU9vhYI/LCpJl3/6j7 hV7w== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.86.132 with SMTP id p4mr1899234wiz.15.1334015413273; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 16:50:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.104.98 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 16:50:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 19:50:13 -0400 Message-ID: From: Ryan Stone To: "Li, Qing" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-net Subject: Re: Removing an IPv6 address does not remove NDP entries on that subnet X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 23:50:14 -0000 On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Li, Qing wrote: > Could you please share with me a call path that you believe is > problematic, or a simple test case that uncovers the issue ? I cannot because it is literally impossible for in6_lltable_prefix_free() to ever be called.