From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 7 18:39:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4455A1065670; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 18:39:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E37D8FC0A; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 18:39:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbbrp2 with SMTP id rp2so73506pbb.13 for ; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 11:39:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=9QLs4RHeQGE+IvuRsgkKKT0hsbFPb85rTYEXizwci7Q=; b=XQ72qkzZznCstjx/22aNzTeylgVRKxrXtLnsVCv7nJv9J9OhK0DfO6Xh6TTJxZ5kLQ PtkXUAXp6Nx+ajmpdbZjDk2stYltpW8s+gz44mZAYhLZh3S3P5jWQFUygTlsOcJd8VpU ppkPLpf/QrJ/9U6HM1/l+EE6fM+9+zbzmD+a8sauL3lDMhoB9+pEU3yyH2NyaD1ZBv7T mO0Fi1xXWvWl8FONva4kMp4gNe3jhsZMlQyoTzLKJmLPEndqwoEuTjCqtEECPYho0ayb OG069zq64lxXUY4YU0Yc9/toIrxpUlNucxnkThALubBuzplxHgWCha+PtoQmYd30jVPv vf7w== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.223.164 with SMTP id qv4mr29768458pbc.20.1344364749126; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 11:39:09 -0700 (PDT) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.68.115.232 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 11:39:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201208021454506984721@gmail.com> References: <201207300139326668335@gmail.com> <2012080200541916697916@gmail.com> <201208011929.23039.bschmidt@freebsd.org> <201208021454506984721@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 11:39:09 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: l7cO5r0PIiC5i_2qVF2L6Gea3NI Message-ID: From: Adrian Chadd To: =?UTF-8?B?5LmU5qWaL0hvbmVzdFFpYW8=?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-wireless , bschmidt Subject: Re: Re: iwn0/wlan0 scan WPA2-PSK/AES as WEP on freebsd9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 18:39:10 -0000 So I've been digging into this a bit. I'm confused; the scan parameter shouldn't HAVE the meshid/meshconf fields populated. The elemids (0x71, 0x72) shouldn't even be there. Oh, but wait. You're running 9, right? The mesh elements are different. Would you mind taking another pcap, this time with the AP in non-11n mode, where it works? I'd like to compare the beacon frame contents. Thanks, Adrian