From owner-freebsd-current  Fri Jan  7  4:47: 4 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from darren2.lnk.telstra.net (darren2.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.53.33])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B2BDD15627; Fri,  7 Jan 2000 04:46:57 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au)
Received: (from root@localhost)
	by darren2.lnk.telstra.net (8.9.1/8.8.7) id MAA02304;
	Fri, 7 Jan 2000 12:46:55 GMT
Received: from avalon.reed.wattle.id.au(192.168.1.1) by firewall.reed.wattle.id.au via smap (V2.1)
	id xma002301; Fri, 7 Jan 00 12:46:52 GMT
Received: (from darrenr@localhost)
	by avalon.reed.wattle.id.au (8.9.0.Beta3/8.9.0.Beta3) id XAA05593;
	Fri, 7 Jan 2000 23:46:50 +1100 (EST)
From: Darren Reed <darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au>
Message-Id: <200001071246.XAA05593@avalon.reed.wattle.id.au>
Subject: Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th
To: imp@village.org (Warner Losh)
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 100 23:46:49 +1100 (EST)
Cc: joe@pavilion.net, darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au,
	dillon@apollo.backplane.com, committers@FreeBSD.org,
	current@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <200001062246.PAA80310@harmony.village.org> from "Warner Losh" at Jan 6, 0 03:46:22 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

In some email I received from Warner Losh, sie wrote:
> 
> In message <20000106212050.D95011@florence.pavilion.net> Josef Karthauser writes:
> : My 3c589d works just fine now, along with suspend/resume :)  (under 4.0).
> 
> The issue with the 3c589d is with its speed.  It is falling back to
> the timeout routine to send data rather than getting an interrupt when
> the tx has happened (or something like this, I'm reporting second hand
> stuff).

Whatever it is, results in ping times being 1000ms then 10ms then 1000ms
then 10ms...when it responds.

i.e. it's a mistake to use FreeBSD 3.x with the 3c589d.

Darren


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message