Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2003 16:03:07 -0700 From: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.org> To: Ceri Davies <ceri@FreeBSD.org>, www@FreeBSD.org, doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: XHTML and the website Message-ID: <20030406230307.GA33473@intruder.bmah.org> In-Reply-To: <20030405151719.GA75703@submonkey.net> References: <20030405151719.GA75703@submonkey.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline If memory serves me right, Ceri Davies wrote: > In August last year, a commit was made to change the website to XHTML, and > since then, all the documents built from SGML have been happily announcing > in their DOCTYPE declaration that they are XHTML 1.0 Transitional. > However, with the exception of the front page of the web site, they aren't; > none of them validate. I might note that all of the documents in our documentation set also claim to be XHTML. I wonder about them? If they're compliant, fixing *them* might be kind of hard since a lot of the XHTML is generated from the toolchain. Like Murray, the cost/benefit ratio is a little hazy to me, but I'd say as long as you're willing, and it doesn't break anything, go for it. Bruce. --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+kLIr2MoxcVugUsMRAnsbAJ0UzHbmPCaAAOdUfE0qSt4hblnnCwCfTYAA AYt+8iRaqCWmps/zzm+acuo= =3pfT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030406230307.GA33473>