From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Aug 30 17:14:38 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0897F3C2507 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 17:14:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ralf-mardorf@riseup.net) Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bfg1T1l7dz4Dm0 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 17:14:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ralf-mardorf@riseup.net) Received: from bell.riseup.net (bell-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Bfg1R2ByszFpBZ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 10:14:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1598807675; bh=/zBqoIEFivUWY7PMtSS/UT5EV2kk+a40IwTvgvxD5ao=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=sW7L8CYMIDr0H+ggTgThsxdefVA1kybfor60kOzZzTq9WGkaLf/TDhrHsOFwVIjXH AJDY9hNwtawFyOllPbgW1O9+WlgpEKQSQlnM4RzQHprBUsylEuZvrAQ9C5uk1Teapf 9RGCIiOb0N+BY+Gh/B5wfX81Tb0s2M11pD3ohp/0= X-Riseup-User-ID: 94844293CD3388E07A09673C236EA2498A48B135ED5D6E1EBB934AE0262DB61D Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bell.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Bfg1Q2vZyzJmgW; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 10:14:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 19:14:32 +0200 From: Ralf Mardorf To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Polytropon Subject: Re: (very OT) Ideal partition schemes (history of partitioning) Message-ID: <20200830191432.7c02fd62@archlinux> In-Reply-To: <20200830172126.5332f0eb.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20200829154417.8dd5f83d.freebsd@edvax.de> <20200830085848.68ab4832@archlinux> <20200830083908.c7cc67a23306c90d51f5e446@sohara.org> <20200830172126.5332f0eb.freebsd@edvax.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Bfg1T1l7dz4Dm0 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b=sW7L8CYM; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=riseup.net; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ralf-mardorf@riseup.net designates 198.252.153.129 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ralf-mardorf@riseup.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.98 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[riseup.net:s=squak]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.02)[-1.023]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.02)[-1.015]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[198.252.153.129:from]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[riseup.net:dkim]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[riseup.net:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[riseup.net,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.34)[-1.337]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16652, ipnet:198.252.153.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[198.252.153.129:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 17:14:38 -0000 On Sun, 30 Aug 2020 17:21:26 +0200, Polytropon wrote: >On Sun, 30 Aug 2020 08:39:08 +0100, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: >> On Sun, 30 Aug 2020 08:58:48 +0200 >> Ralf Mardorf wrote: >> =20 >> > There's no need to take 10 shots/second of a still life and to >> > repeat it 20 times, to end up with 200 photos. =20 >>=20 >> No there isn't, taking many shots and selecting the best has >> of course long been standard practice for professional photographers >> digital cameras and modern memory sizes just make it possible to >> carry this to extremes. =20 > >Rule: "Better have 100 photos and select 10 good ones, instead >of having only 10 photos which are all crap." ;-) The averaged 36 photos and then replacing the film cartridge gave holiday as well as professional photographers the opportunity to think. They not necessarily used this opportunity, let alone that some used very long films for way more than 36 photos. However, my impression is that nowadays almost all photos are shot planless, without thinking, while in the past at least some holiday, as well as professional photos were more thoughtfully shot. Btw. I'll only _try_ to replace my not that good, but quite usable, but aged and dusty analog 35 mm camera, a Canon AE-1 Program. I don't know, if a middle-rate digital camera can replace it. My target isn't necessarily replacing the analog camera. I want to get a camera to make stop motion films and it would be nice, if I could replace the analog camera, too. I consider to buy a Sony =CE=B16400 kit 16-50 mm, since I can't spend more money. Does somebody know how good or bad this and similar APS-C cameras are, especially compared to analog reflex cameras, such as the Canon?