From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Dec  5 01:26:05 2012
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
 id 6560F5BB; Wed,  5 Dec 2012 01:26:05 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 01:26:05 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r308256 - in head/misc/figlet: . files
Message-ID: <20121205012605.GA45591@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201212041734.qB4HYC4A045663@svn.freebsd.org>
 <CAF6rxg=_MRSQr7Us1J5NeGd=8C8s6U09Xoy9ARw0g6N0yejL9Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <20121204175051.GB55521@FreeBSD.org>
 <20121204181403.GK3960@dragon.NUXI.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20121204181403.GK3960@dragon.NUXI.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org,
 Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head
 <svn-ports-head.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 01:26:05 -0000

On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 10:14:03AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 05:50:51PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > Seconded.  Most users just hate delays in the builds caused by harness
> > stuff
> 
> $ /usr/bin/time -h make regression-test
> Run tests in /src/pkg/Fix/figlet/work/figlet-2.2.5
> ...
>  All tests passed.
> 
>          1.65s real              0.72s user              1.41s sys

OK, no problem then, sorry for the noise.

> We cannot currently pass the subversion (as one example).  If we could at
> one point and then run them as part of building the port -- then we could
> give confidance that a particular build and environment will work as
> intended.

Fair enough, understood.

./danfe