Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 22 May 2006 04:30:32 -0700
From:      Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd@jdc.parodius.com>
To:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Number of maintainers vs. number of ports
Message-ID:  <20060522113032.GA50521@pentarou.parodius.com>
In-Reply-To: <cb5206420605220417o5a5d8667l648f42644f39d4e4@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <cb5206420605220417o5a5d8667l648f42644f39d4e4@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 03:17:21PM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> Just a quick notice:
> 
> Ports 18 months ago: 10796
> Maintainers 18 months ago: ~535
> 
> Ports now: 14727
> Maintainers now: ~393

That comes to an average of 37 ports per maintainer.  I assume this
includes ports@freebsd.org as one (1) maintainer, which would explain
the scary-looking 37:1 ratio.

It would be interesting to see these statistics generated for ports
that *are not* maintained by ports@freebsd.org.

-- 
| Jeremy Chadwick                                 jdc at parodius.com |
| Parodius Networking                        http://www.parodius.com/ |
| UNIX Systems Administrator                   Mountain View, CA, USA |
| Making life hard for others since 1977.               PGP: 4BD6C0CB |




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060522113032.GA50521>