From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Feb 11 02:22:35 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C39BB16A4CE
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 02:22:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail010.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail010.syd.optusnet.com.au
	[211.29.132.56])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E450443D1D
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 02:22:34 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from tfrank@optushome.com.au)
Received: from marvin.home.local (c211-28-241-189.eburwd5.vic.optusnet.com.au
	[211.28.241.189])i1BAMRl27003;	Wed, 11 Feb 2004 21:22:28 +1100
Received: by marvin.home.local (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 9DE4524D; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 21:22:26 +1100 (EST)
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 21:22:26 +1100
From: Tony Frank <tfrank@optushome.com.au>
To: Bjorn Eikeland <bjorn@eikeland.info>
Message-ID: <20040211102226.GA25251@marvin.home.local>
References: <opr24pm6dnomdbx5@localhost> <4028C9A9.7090503@mac.com>
	<opr25n47dcomdbx5@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <opr25n47dcomdbx5@localhost>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: dummynet = local taffic > 100ms - help!
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:22:35 -0000

Hi,

On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 02:08:57PM +0100, Bjorn Eikeland wrote:
> >>Any suggestions what can be causing this? (I've only got the one nic,
> >>and use a adsl router for internett)
> >You might also consider increasing the queue length of your pipes when 
> >using prioriziation--- are you seeing packets being dropped?
> My bad, HZ is 1000 will try queue lengts, but havent seen any packets
> getting dropped. Have included ping statistics below:
> 
> --- localhost ping statistics ---
>   10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0% packet loss
>   round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.039/0.055/0.074/0.011 ms
> --- 10.0.0.2 ping statistics --- (My box)
>   10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0% packet loss
>   round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 30.989/114.977/162.977/36.056 ms
> --- 10.0.0.3 ping statistics --- (Host on my LAN)
>   10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0% packet loss
>   round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.224/0.247/0.300/0.024 ms
> --- 80.202.106.8 ping statistics --- (ADSL routers public ip)
>   10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0% packet loss
>   round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 18.992/54.928/88.982/21.957 ms
> --- www.google.akadns.net ping statistics ---
>   10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0% packet loss
>   round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 103.102/140.079/189.990/24.000 ms

What kind of response times do you get if you disable the queues/pipes and try
without?

Or just add a single rule at front of rules list to allow all traffic and
repeat your tests - try and confirm that the problem is with the pipes
or queues...

Tony