From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 9 18:00:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B3DC16A4CE for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 18:00:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A82143D55 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 18:00:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i59I0gst033231 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 18:00:42 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i59I0g84033221; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 18:00:42 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Resent-Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 18:00:42 GMT Resent-Message-Id: <200406091800.i59I0g84033221@freefall.freebsd.org> Resent-From: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org (GNATS Filer) Resent-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, Linus Sjoberg Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46C0C16A4CE for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 17:53:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from www.freebsd.org (www.freebsd.org [216.136.204.117]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4168043D1D for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 17:53:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nobody@FreeBSD.org) Received: from www.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i59Hrbiw094411 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 17:53:37 GMT (envelope-from nobody@www.freebsd.org) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by www.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i59HrbAN094410; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 17:53:37 GMT (envelope-from nobody) Message-Id: <200406091753.i59HrbAN094410@www.freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 17:53:37 GMT From: Linus Sjoberg To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org X-Send-Pr-Version: www-2.3 Subject: ports/67762: portupgrade of stunnel asks for input even when run with BATCH=1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 18:00:57 -0000 >Number: 67762 >Category: ports >Synopsis: portupgrade of stunnel asks for input even when run with BATCH=1 >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: medium >Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Wed Jun 09 18:00:42 GMT 2004 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Linus Sjoberg >Release: 4.10-STABLE >Organization: >Environment: FreeBSD hal9000.alcom.aland.fi 4.10-STABLE FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE #17: Wed Jun 2 09:32:15 EEST 2004 root@hal9000.alcom.aland.fi:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HAL i386 >Description: When doing a ports upgrade using # BATCH=1 portupgrade -a you expect all upgrades to be performed without any interaction with the user. This is not true for stunnel. When I checked my portupgrade today it was hung waiting for input with the prompt: "Remove group stunnel? [y/n]" Appearently this is due to the stunnel deinstall-script. After entering a 'n' the upgrade continued as espected. Either the deinstall should not ask the question or otherwise stunnel should not be upgraded when running portupgrade when BATCH is set. >How-To-Repeat: I have not tried to reproduce this, but it should suffice to run portupgrade with BATCH set when there is a newer stunnel available. >Fix: Check for BATCH in stunnel Makefile. >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: