From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 29 14:43:09 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8DF916A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 14:43:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from dragoncrest.jasnetworks.net (dragoncrest.jasnetworks.net [65.194.254.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7C7E43F85 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 14:43:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dragoncrest@voyager.net) Received: from works.voyager.net (works.jasnetworks.net [192.168.0.2]) h9THqLZ9046325 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 17:52:22 GMT (envelope-from dragoncrest@voyager.net) Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20031029175012.00a81670@pop.voyager.net> X-Sender: dragoncrest@pop.voyager.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 17:52:09 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG From: Dragoncrest Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: Should I upgrade to 4.9? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 22:43:09 -0000 I'm upgrading all my workstations to 4.9 tonight, but I have a small mail server (p120 with 120m ram) that's running 4.8 that does nothing more than fetch mail, sort it, scan it, then deliver it locally for me to pick up at my leisure. I'm wondering if it would be in my best interests to leave it at 4.8 for right now or go ahead with the 4.9 upgrade. The mail server is my only mission critical machine right now, so that's why I'm asking this. It's the only box I can't afford to have go down. Any help or suggestions is welcome. Thanks.