Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 14:06:51 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: kudzu@tenebras.com Cc: phk@phk.freebsd.dk, small@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD's embedded agenda Message-ID: <20060525.140651.-1844001833.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <4475CD42.2010509@tenebras.com> References: <2538.1148556253@critter.freebsd.dk> <4475CD42.2010509@tenebras.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <4475CD42.2010509@tenebras.com>
Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com> writes:
: Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
:
: > For smaller systems, an additive approach would make more sense
:
: Amen. For larger systems, too, IMHO. I've been saying this for
: years, but even those things which we think of as necessary for
: most installs (MTA, DNS, toolchain) should be packages.
We use the additiv approach at work. That which you do not include is
omitted. Doable, but keeping the dependency lists accurate since we
originally did this work for 3.2 has been the biggest issue...
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060525.140651.-1844001833.imp>