Date: Tue, 20 Dec 1994 20:26:25 -0800 From: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM> To: stesin@elvisti.kiev.ua (Andrew V. Stesin) Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [?!] So, is this a bug in the kernel execve() code? Message-ID: <199412210426.UAA00561@corbin.Root.COM> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 20 Dec 94 01:20:06 GMT." <D1351I.AM5@store.elvisti.kiev.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>I tried to dig into that piece of kernel code, but sorry -- I'm not >a wisard, I'm not a kernel hacker, I'm not even on a mailing list. >I personally have no idea about how legal this behavior is and how to >fix it. I don't even know -- was this reported yet or not? > >So, questions. > > 1. How valid the described behavior is? If it isn't considered > valid, how one can fix it? > 2. Is there a set of "official" patches for 1.1.5? Where? > We're running vanilla 1.1.5.0 kernel, I only replaced > some user-area utilities. Maybe some bugfix patches are > needed? The bug was fixed shortly after it was reported - about 5 months ago. A patch to fix this and many other bugs should still be available on ref.tfs.com. -DG
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199412210426.UAA00561>