Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 19:43:24 +0000 From: Bruce Cran <bruce@cran.org.uk> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default Message-ID: <4EE6595C.3080608@cran.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20198.21654.915449.536365@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> References: <4EE1EAFE.3070408@m5p.com> <4EE22421.9060707@gmail.com> <4EE6060D.5060201@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20111212155159.GB73597@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20198.21654.915449.536365@hergotha.csail.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/12/2011 19:23, Garrett Wollman wrote: > Where do you get that idea? I've never seen any evidence for this > proposition (although the claim is repeated often enough). What are > the specific circumstances that make this useful? Where did the > number come from? It's just something I've heard repeated, and people claiming that setting it improves performance. This explains how the value 224 was obtained: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2010-September/058686.html -- Bruce Cran
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EE6595C.3080608>