Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 17:41:22 +0300 From: Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recent TTYDEF_LFLAG default change Message-ID: <20041103144122.GA34879@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <20041103112615.GA13218@nagual.pp.ru> References: <20041103111813.GB13047@nagual.pp.ru> <16246.1099480832@critter.freebsd.dk> <20041103112615.GA13218@nagual.pp.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 02:26:15PM +0300, Andrey Chernov wrote: > > Most of it would be bogus I think, software should record the current > > state and restore that, not mangle it with defaults. > > Some tty/pty-emulators can (in spirit of screen). It is not ours, it is > common BSD thing. Better to not make surprises and harden porter's job > here, really, without a reason. Inside kernel you can do anything you want > using TTYDEF_LFLAG_NOECHO. More such things: getty and getty-likes (i.e. fax recievers or FIDO gates combined with getty). BTW, what about our getty now? It uses TTYDEF_LFLAG. Python tty module use TTYDEF_LFLAG too: http://pydoc.org/1.5.2/tty.html Moreover, it is few minutes results, I even don't try to search hard. -- http://ache.pp.ru/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041103144122.GA34879>