From owner-freebsd-scsi Thu Jul 16 12:41:18 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA01747 for freebsd-scsi-outgoing; Thu, 16 Jul 1998 12:41:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from narnia.plutotech.com (narnia.plutotech.com [206.168.67.130]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA01737 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 1998 12:41:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gibbs@narnia.plutotech.com) Received: (from gibbs@localhost) by narnia.plutotech.com (8.8.8/8.7.3) id NAA07357; Thu, 16 Jul 1998 13:35:41 -0600 (MDT) Date: Thu, 16 Jul 1998 13:35:41 -0600 (MDT) From: "Justin T. Gibbs" Message-Id: <199807161935.NAA07357@narnia.plutotech.com> To: Matthew Reimer cc: scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Problem building with ch and CAM 19980712 snapshot Newsgroups: pluto.freebsd.scsi In-Reply-To: <35AE41F1.18E0FC12@vpop.net> User-Agent: tin/pre-1.4-971204 (UNIX) (FreeBSD/3.0-CURRENT (i386)) Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In article <35AE41F1.18E0FC12@vpop.net> you wrote: > > It looks like the definition of d_ioctl_t in sys/conf.h is different in > 3.0 versus 2.2: Yes. I just screwed up the merge when I brought scsi_ch.c in from our current CAM branch into the stable one. The change you propose is the correct one and should be safe. -- Justin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message