Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 12:52:33 -0800 From: Beech Rintoul <beech@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: maintained compat.linux.osrelease versions (was: Re: Skype's 2nd process hogging CPU...) Message-ID: <200711021252.46943.beech@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20071102192022.02853d42@meijome.net> References: <20071102094617.1e29bd52@meijome.net> <30290510@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <20071102192022.02853d42@meijome.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 02 November 2007, Norberto Meijome said: > On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 09:21:53 +0300 > > Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> wrote: > > > It's happened with compat.linux.osrelease both set to 2.6 and > > > 2.4.20. > > > > Not an answer to the question, but... There are two > > compat.linux.osrelease values that are maintained by linux > > kernel team for now. They are 2.4.2 (the default one) and > > 2.6.16 (is going to be a default for HEAD and RELENG_7 in > > the future). > > > > Other values are not _tested_/maintained/supported by the > > linux emulation team. > > > > Though that doesn't mean *someone* can't maintain/support > > those values. ;-) > > Of course, good point. I was just following ports/UPDATING in this > regards. > > BTW, I've had this happen again while simply going for a cup of tea > - definitely under 5 minutes. i got it at the start of the cpu > spike - i could see in the gkrellm2 cpu graph precisely where it > jumped up. CPU was 159% on this extra process. > > I've had several lockups on the machine ... I havent been able to > pin it down to skype.. BUT > > I've since rolled back to my skype 1.2 package, and I've been > running with no lockups for 7 hours with no lockup (compared that > to 4 lockups in the same time with skype 1.4. Again, it could be a > number of things, i'm still trying to narrow it down...) > > Cheers, > B I'm definitely interested to know what you find out. I have it running on a 6.x box and haven't seen any of the problem you describe. I was a bit hasty in committing it to the main port, but having it as -devel seems appropriate given the fallout. Beech -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - beech@FreeBSD.org /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/6.2R/announce.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200711021252.46943.beech>