Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 27 Sep 2017 13:10:54 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 222632] Enable Capsicum for connect(2)
Message-ID:  <bug-222632-8-znumKX1agC@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-222632-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-222632-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D222632

Domagoj Stolfa <domagoj.stolfa@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |domagoj.stolfa@gmail.com

--- Comment #8 from Domagoj Stolfa <domagoj.stolfa@gmail.com> ---
I've not investigated this too much, but I can see why in some sense,
connect(2) could be seen as gaining an additional capability and could have
issues. The connectat(2) system call is the one that works with PF_LOCAL
sockets, so you could use that instead for a Unix socket.

There does seem to be a discrepancy across the documentation and what is
actually implemented, as CAP_CONNECT explicitly states that connect(2) is
allowed and the check is in place in the actual implementation, but connect=
 is
not present in sys/kern/capabilities.conf, resulting in ECAPMODE.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-222632-8-znumKX1agC>