Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 21:59:30 GMT From: Alvaro Martinez <alvaro.mtr@gmail.com> To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: misc/149817: portinstall -p option doesn't make packages of build dependencies Message-ID: <201008192159.o7JLxUEr031822@www.freebsd.org> Resent-Message-ID: <201008192200.o7JM08sx057099@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 149817 >Category: misc >Synopsis: portinstall -p option doesn't make packages of build dependencies >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Thu Aug 19 22:00:08 UTC 2010 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Alvaro Martinez >Release: 7.3-release >Organization: UNAM (nat.univ of Mexico) >Environment: FreeBSD deskfree.local 7.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.3-RELEASE #0: Sun Mar 21 06:15:01 UTC 2010 root@walker.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 >Description: when installing a port, usually one wishes to use the most of packages with -P option in portinstall, and if you like to use that port in several installations (like in a shared packages archive), its a good idea to use -p also. but if a port require differents dependencies for building than for installing, portinstall doesn't look for binary packages at installing those deps even if you specified -P. The same happens with -p, portinstall doesn't make packages of each build dependency. i think it sould >How-To-Repeat: everything like portinstall -vRPp <port> >Fix: >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201008192159.o7JLxUEr031822>