From owner-cvs-all Thu Feb 21 10:49:43 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mail.musha.org (daemon.musha.org [218.44.187.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B3CB37B400; Thu, 21 Feb 2002 10:49:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from archon.musha.org (archon.local.idaemons.org [192.168.1.32]) by mail.musha.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55B194D805; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 03:49:34 +0900 (JST) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 03:49:34 +0900 Message-ID: <864rkak6v5.wl@archon.musha.org> From: "Akinori MUSHA" To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" , Garrett Wollman , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics/libwmf Makefile pkg-plist In-Reply-To: <20020221182409.GA44592@madman.nectar.cc> References: <200202211702.g1LH2Kw69894@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020221170549.GB40194@madman.nectar.cc> <200202211713.g1LHDFF25291@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <20020221171640.GA44316@madman.nectar.cc> <200202211730.g1LHUqQ25415@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <20020221182409.GA44592@madman.nectar.cc> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.5 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) LIMIT/1.14.7 (Fujiidera) APEL/10.3 MULE XEmacs/21.1 (patch 14) (Cuyahoga Valley) (i386--freebsd) Organization: Associated I. Daemons X-PGP-Public-Key: finger knu@FreeBSD.org X-PGP-Fingerprint: 081D 099C 1705 861D 4B70 B04A 920B EFC7 9FD9 E1EE MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At Thu, 21 Feb 2002 12:24:09 -0600, nectar wrote: > On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 12:30:52PM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote: > > what the ports, in general, are interested in is > > *source* compatibility, and the library version number does not > > necessarily help at all there. > > Of course it helps. We have specifically instrumented the Ports > Collection so that these dependencies can be detected. If the version > numbers were not taken into account, then there would not be any > reasonable means of detecting API changes. > > What exactly are you arguing? That we should drop the use of shared > library version numbers from ports? BTW, I posted a reply to the ports@ list CC'ing to portmgr@. Let's move and continue this discussion there. -- / /__ __ Akinori.org / MUSHA.org / ) ) ) ) / FreeBSD.org / Ruby-lang.org Akinori MUSHA aka / (_ / ( (__( @ iDaemons.org / and.or.jp "Somewhere out of a memory.. of lighted streets on quiet nights.." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message