From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 1 11:03:55 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1233) id 4406E106574C; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 11:03:55 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 11:03:55 +0000 From: Alexander Best To: Garrett Cooper Message-ID: <20111201110355.GA60151@freebsd.org> References: <201111292128.pATLSnKr067459@svn.freebsd.org> <20111201005932.GA54417@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, John Baldwin Subject: Re: svn commit: r228148 - head/sys/conf X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 11:03:55 -0000 On Wed Nov 30 11, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Alexander Best wrote: > > On Tue Nov 29 11, John Baldwin wrote: > >> Author: jhb > >> Date: Tue Nov 29 21:28:48 2011 > >> New Revision: 228148 > >> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/228148 > >> > >> Log: > >>   Remove a bit of debugging that accidentally crept in earlier. > >> > >> Modified: > >>   head/sys/conf/newvers.sh > >> > >> Modified: head/sys/conf/newvers.sh > >> ============================================================================== > >> --- head/sys/conf/newvers.sh  Tue Nov 29 20:06:27 2011        (r228147) > >> +++ head/sys/conf/newvers.sh  Tue Nov 29 21:28:48 2011        (r228148) > >> @@ -99,7 +99,6 @@ for dir in /bin /usr/bin /usr/local/bin; > >>  done > >> > >>  if [ -n "$svnversion" ] ; then > >> -     echo "$svnversion" > >>       svn=`cd ${SYSDIR} && $svnversion` > > > > any chance we could replace $svnversion with something like the following: > > > > 'svn info|grep ^Revision|sed 's/^Revision: //'' ? > > > > this is much faster and the only downside seems to be the missing {MSP} at the > > end. > > > > running a standard hdd, svnversion takes almost half a minute, while the > > command above finishes in < 0.1 seconds. > > We already hashed over that in the last discussion. svnversion was > picked because it iterates over the entire tree and you know for an > absolute fact that it's running versions X-Y-Z, instead of the version > of the Makefile being X. sorry. wasn't aware of that. thanks for the info. cheers. alex > Thanks, > -Garrett