From owner-freebsd-current Tue Mar 25 04:51:23 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id EAA09944 for current-outgoing; Tue, 25 Mar 1997 04:51:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from dg-rtp.dg.com (dg-rtp.rtp.dg.com [128.222.1.2]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id EAA09934 for ; Tue, 25 Mar 1997 04:51:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by dg-rtp.dg.com (5.4R3.10/dg-rtp-v02) id AA13063; Tue, 25 Mar 1997 07:50:46 -0500 Received: from ponds by dg-rtp.dg.com.rtp.dg.com; Tue, 25 Mar 1997 07:50 EST Received: from lakes.water.net (lakes [10.0.0.3]) by ponds.water.net (8.8.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id GAA19287; Tue, 25 Mar 1997 06:58:10 -0500 (EST) Received: (from rivers@localhost) by lakes.water.net (8.8.3/8.6.9) id HAA00253; Tue, 25 Mar 1997 07:03:43 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 25 Mar 1997 07:03:43 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas David Rivers Message-Id: <199703251203.HAA00253@lakes.water.net> To: ponds!freebsd.org!announce, ponds!time.cdrom.com!jkh Subject: Re: 2.2.1-RELEASE will be [re]appearing shortly.. Cc: ponds!freebsd.org!current Content-Type: text Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > We found some issues with the 2940 driver and several other areas of > the system which really were on the "cusp" of being fixed, and it > seemed an unnecessary waste to make 2.2R users wait another 4 months > or so for 2.2.5 to come out before getting these fixes when we had > them available less than a week after release time (especially when > many of those fixes had already gone into an "older" release, > 2.1.7.1) and there were many emails demanding this, so... I would be happy to test out these aha2940 fixs before the "official" release if someone just points me to a GENERIC kernel. ... > > > Since the 2.2R CDROM has not yet been pressed, whatever I finally come > up with in these next few hours WILL be shipped as 2.2-RELEASE on > CDROM. As it says in the release notes, 2.2.1R is a full replacement > for 2.2.0R and once all this dust settles then everyone should just > pretend that the earlier release never happened. :-) Ummm, I'm a little slow on the up-take this morning. Does that mean that the up-coming (aka 2.2.1) release will be on the CDROM; or the older, now missing (aka 2.2.0) release will be on the CDROM? If the 2.2.1-RELEASE is on the CDROM, is there time remaining to test the aha2940 corrections? - Thanks - - Dave Rivers -