From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 18 07:04:13 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3AFF37B401 for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2003 07:04:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bigbox.shawnyeager.com (bigbox.shawnyeager.com [198.78.66.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AC62043FE0 for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2003 07:04:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mail@shawnyeager.com) Received: (qmail 89136 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2003 14:04:09 -0000 Received: from cpe00045ad838dc-cm023459906567.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com (HELO shawnyeager.com) (24.156.61.231) by bigbox.shawnyeager.com with SMTP; 18 Aug 2003 14:04:09 -0000 Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 10:04:13 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552) To: oliver@FreeBSD.org From: Shawn Yeager Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.552) cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD Port: courier-imap-2.1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 14:04:14 -0000 Hi, Oliver. It's only anecdotal at this point, but it *seems* as if 2.1.0 is significantly heavier on CPU utilization. I'm seeing a single imapd instance consume 13-15% of CPU cycles today. I'm submitting this as an FYI only should you receive other such reports. Thanks, Shawn -- shawnyeager.com +1 416 305 4142