From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jun 21 17:30:32 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 968F21065678
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 21 Jun 2012 17:30:32 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 039D78FC20
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 21 Jun 2012 17:30:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5LHUNfV009179;
	Thu, 21 Jun 2012 19:30:23 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id
	q5LHUN07009176; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 19:30:23 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 19:30:23 +0200 (CEST)
From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To: "Robison, Dave" <david.robison@fisglobal.com>
In-Reply-To: <4FE35745.9060601@fisglobal.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211929540.5130@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References: <402199FE-380B-41B6-866B-7D5D66C457D5@lpthe.jussieu.fr>
	<CAH3a3KWKNF5Bt-8=KgtbMh=rV6GfUO7OaeE6-SutxkcRe8cG3Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206191953280.8234@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<20120621015237.GB58187@neutralgood.org>
	<AC6A916E-066B-4399-89E1-90C2394327E7@lpthe.jussieu.fr>
	<4FE35208.40708@queernet.org>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211907470.4170@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<4FE35745.9060601@fisglobal.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7
	(wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]);
	Thu, 21 Jun 2012 19:30:23 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Why Clang
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 17:30:32 -0000

> Because there's no reason to do that. It's an asinine suggestion.
>
> Clang is here to stay. Most of us are happy about that decision. GCC

Because most that are not already stopped and ignored thing. and use GCC.

Politics won.