From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 12 19:10:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51DBC16A405 for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 19:10:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF8C543D6D for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 19:10:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D65A1A4D7B; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 12:10:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 944B551559; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 15:10:03 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 15:10:03 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: martinko Message-ID: <20060412191003.GA25961@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <443BAE40.9050704@dial.pipex.com> <001301c65d7f$0b9dab70$dededede@avalon.lan> <20060411203727.GA90177@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060412184851.GA25677@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: upcoming release 6.1: old version of some core components X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 19:10:17 -0000 --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 09:07:11PM +0200, martinko wrote: > and it feels they're not going to release 1.0 any time soon.. i've been > seeing 0.9.something for longer than i can remember. >=20 > and btw i've always thought of openssl and openssh as somehow > coupled/interconnected. but openssl hasn't reached 1.0 while openssh is > already past 4. (and again it seems to me openssh changes major numbers > not according to major changes but whenever its version reaches x.9.) openssh uses openssl but they're not tightly coupled. Kris --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEPVCKWry0BWjoQKURAtF1AJ9qrlRX1uqYdNIFepikn5rFcBGZ4gCeM17j mgzZ+pj+ksh9gQrVzVzwsAY= =Me50 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw--