From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 22 23:29:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B57E316A415; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 23:29:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from itetcu@FreeBSD.org) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (it.buh.tecnik93.com [81.196.204.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD48E43D70; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 23:29:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@FreeBSD.org) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDCF31711A; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 02:29:28 +0300 (EEST) Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 02:29:28 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20061023022928.35b7b23c@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <453BFC2A.5010501@FreeBSD.org> References: <20061022095811.GA10743@zaphod.nitro.dk> <1161515330.751.9.camel@localhost> <200610221423.19817.andy@athame.co.uk> <453BFC2A.5010501@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.5.2 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_xkqawxwBfXWCwt4apSmAgVn; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 Cc: UMEMOTO , Joel, "Simon L. Nielsen" , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Dahl , Hajimu Subject: Re: Resolver not always resolving hostnames X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 23:29:31 -0000 --Sig_xkqawxwBfXWCwt4apSmAgVn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 16:18:02 -0700 Doug Barton wrote: > Andy Fawcett wrote: >=20 > > I'm only seeing this effect (or maybe only noticing it) with > > csup/cvsup. Could be coincidence though. >=20 > Hrrm, it's odd that it affects both csup _and_ cvsup, since the > former is written in C, and links natively against our libraries. I'm=20 > wondering if we're seeing a situation where the name servers that=20 > those hostnames are delegated to are just taking a long time to=20 > respond, and neither app is patient enough. I think it would be an=20 > interesting experiment to see what happens if you increase the retry=20 > timeout. >=20 > Is anyone else seeing this problem with other applications? Simon,=20 > I'll address your problems with host(1) in a separate mail. I'm seeing it with squid. --=20 IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" BOFH excuse #212: Of course it doesn't work, we've performed a software upgrade --Sig_xkqawxwBfXWCwt4apSmAgVn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFO/7YBX6fi0k6KXsRAjPvAJsEZiRCz/l7GKO8iFiWDtslih1YmACgpv+G x8yZNXDydy5K03DeTrij+F8= =88bL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_xkqawxwBfXWCwt4apSmAgVn--