Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 11:44:01 -0600 From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> To: "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net> Cc: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: How to control address used by INADDR_ANY? Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20020420113621.021dfd00@nospam.lariat.org> In-Reply-To: <20020420122212.A27415@over-yonder.net> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20020420111258.021d7270@nospam.lariat.org> <4.3.2.7.2.20020419144005.0358c610@nospam.lariat.org> <4.3.2.7.2.20020419144005.0358c610@nospam.lariat.org> <4.3.2.7.2.20020420004621.02379880@nospam.lariat.org> <3CC1245C.EEE4ADE@mindspring.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20020420111258.021d7270@nospam.lariat.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 11:22 AM 4/20/2002, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: >The same routable address you have on its internal interface, with a /32 >netmask, and then the default route pointed out the interface. I'd considered this, but wasn't sure about the effects of having an address assigned to two interfaces simultaneously. How would this affect responses to ARP queries? Other options I've considered are: 1) Using natd to change the souce addresses on outgoing packets with a source addresses in 10.x to something routable (that is, having the machine do NAT for its own internal processes). Would this work? 2) Running local processes in a "jail" (assuming that this would force their IP source addresses to the address assigned to the "jail...." Would it? I'd need to figure out how to configure this, because the natd documentation doesn't really explain how it works). --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.3.2.7.2.20020420113621.021dfd00>