Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 09:51:58 -0600 From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/i386 local_apic.c Message-ID: <451A9E1E.30601@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <200609271117.25831.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <200609261608.k8QG8TYB044266@repoman.freebsd.org> <200609261313.03759.jhb@freebsd.org> <4519B2E5.9000304@FreeBSD.org> <200609271117.25831.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Baldwin wrote: > On Tuesday 26 September 2006 19:08, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > >>John Baldwin wrote: >> >>>On Tuesday 26 September 2006 12:08, Maxim Sobolev wrote: >>> >>>>sobomax 2006-09-26 16:08:29 UTC >>>> >>>> FreeBSD src repository >>>> >>>> Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_6) >>>> sys/i386/i386 local_apic.c >>>> Log: >>>> Revert 1.17.2.8, which reportedly causes problems on some hardware. >>> >>>The report I saw was that it broke ULE in general. Are you going to > > revert it > >>>from amd64 as well? >> >>Yes, you are right - this is ULE specific bug. In fact, quick grep of >>the ULE code reveals that it doesn't honor hlt_cpus_mask, so that the >>problem is with ULE, not with the change in question. > > > Well, hlt_cpus_mask is really an x86-specific hack. :) > x86 and amd64, which represent about 95% of FreeBSD. Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?451A9E1E.30601>