Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 18 May 2002 10:21:55 +0200 (CEST)
From:      Attila Nagy <bra@fsn.hu>
To:        Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>
Cc:        freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: HEADS UP: ALTQ integration developer preview
Message-ID:  <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205181018300.10011-100000@scribble.fsn.hu>
In-Reply-To: <3CE55A9B.73EA3DE4@mindspring.com>
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.10.10205170216500.29826-100000@ady.warpnet.ro> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205171056200.2091-100000@scribble.fsn.hu> <3CE55A9B.73EA3DE4@mindspring.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello,

> > the "em" driver (if "gx" is already in the initial plan), because it
> > reportedly works better (for example I couldn't do NFS serving with UDP
> > packets bigger than the MTU with that, while the "em" driver works OK).
> It *does* frag packets bigger than the MTU, right?
netstat didn't show any errors regarding to that. If I used an NFS
readsize, smaller than the 1500 bytes MTU it worked (was slow, but
worked).
netstat's frag counters were increased.
I couldn't use tcpdump (I had no bpf support) to see what happens on the
wire...

--------[ Free Software ISOs - ftp://ftp.fsn.hu/pub/CDROM-Images/ ]-------
Attila Nagy					e-mail: Attila.Nagy@fsn.hu
Free Software Network (FSN.HU)		  phone @work: +361 210 1415 (194)
						cell.: +3630 306 6758


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.44.0205181018300.10011-100000>