From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 21 18:05:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 207031065670 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:05:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from legolas@legolasweb.nl) Received: from smtpq1.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net (smtpq1.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net [212.54.42.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C781C8FC0C for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:05:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [212.54.42.135] (helo=smtp4.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net) by smtpq1.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ShlR6-00053K-F4 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 19:44:52 +0200 Received: from 5357e32a.cm-6-8d.dynamic.ziggo.nl ([83.87.227.42] helo=homey.local) by smtp4.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ShlR6-0005YG-64 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 19:44:52 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 19:45:35 +0200 From: Stas Verberkt To: In-Reply-To: References: <402199FE-380B-41B6-866B-7D5D66C457D5@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <20120621015237.GB58187@neutralgood.org> <4FE35208.40708@queernet.org> <4FE35616.9080304@queernet.org> Message-ID: X-Sender: legolas@legolasweb.nl User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.7.2 X-Ziggo-spambar: -- X-Ziggo-spamscore: -2.7 X-Ziggo-spamreport: ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_20=-0.001, PROLO_TRUST_RDNS=-3, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.2, WORDPRESS_PLUS=0.12 X-Ziggo-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Flag: No Subject: Re: Why Clang X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:05:46 -0000 Mark Felder schreef op 21-06-2012 19:28: > On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:16:31 -0500, Wojciech Puchar > wrote: > >> programs compiled by GPLv3 compiler are not encumbered. > > This has not been decided in court yet. > Additionally, the exceptions for using the GCC runtime library for non-GPL executables is limited to what hey call "eligible compilation processes", what rules out using proprietary GCC plugins or other combinations of core GCC functionality with non-GPL tooling and extensions. Please note that this is indeed not tested in court. Therefore, reality may turn out even more interesting. That's why a lawyer's answer should always be "it depends". :)