From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 12 18:42:41 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B30E16A4CE for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 18:42:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from postal1.es.net (postal1.es.net [198.128.3.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF6EB43FBF for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 18:42:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from oberman@es.net) Received: from ptavv.es.net ([198.128.4.29]) by postal1.es.net (Postal Node 1) with ESMTP (SSL) id MUA74016; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 18:42:39 -0800 Received: from ptavv (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ptavv.es.net (Tachyon Server) with ESMTP id 46B905D07; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 18:42:39 -0800 (PST) To: Mike Hoskins In-Reply-To: Message from Mike Hoskins <20031112173910.A31339@fubar.adept.org> Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 18:42:39 -0800 From: "Kevin Oberman" Message-Id: <20031113024239.46B905D07@ptavv.es.net> cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: drm, irqs, etc. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 02:42:41 -0000 > Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 17:43:02 -0800 (PST) > From: Mike Hoskins > Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org > > [ updating for completeness ] > On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Eric Anholt wrote: > > On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 21:24, Mike Hoskins wrote: > > > i've got XFree86 4.3.0 installed, from the "X-4" meta port. that went > > > smoothly. using the mga driver with a matrox g450 (dual head). no dri on > > > head 2 as expected, but again no obvious problems. > > > what i've noticed (this is 5.1-p8) is that after X has been running for > > > awhile, trying to exit X causes a hang. > > 5.1 is -current, not -stable, so you should be mailing the -current > > list. I've reset the cc: appropriately. > > i'm always confused about that, since i cvsup RELENG_5_1 not "." -- and > don't usually view something that's been tagged as a RELEASE the same as > CURRENT. ;) but thanks for moving this to the correct list. In reality, 5.0 and 5.1 are neither, but questions have to go somewhere and it was announced some time ago that until a V5 version was declared 'STABLE', that questions should go to CURRENT and not STABLE. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634