From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 14 14:37:33 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1357937B401 for ; Thu, 14 Aug 2003 14:37:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.securesoftware.com (w168.z205158144.scl-ca.dsl.cnc.net [205.158.144.168]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DED143F75 for ; Thu, 14 Aug 2003 14:37:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bob@securesoftware.com) Received: from [10.10.20.211] (wless211.securesoftware.com [10.10.20.211]) by mail.securesoftware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFE741D1; Thu, 14 Aug 2003 17:36:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Bob Fleck To: Nate Lawson In-Reply-To: <20030814124838.S93797@root.org> References: <20030814111800.P93797@root.org> <20030815.044155.730550374.matoba@st.rim.or.jp> <20030814124838.S93797@root.org> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1060896672.1376.6.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.4 Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 21:31:13 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: MATOBA Hirozumi Subject: Re: clock works slowly when I change CPU speed X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 21:37:33 -0000 On Thu, 2003-08-14 at 19:50, Nate Lawson wrote: > This indicates that the problem was introduced in a kernel change between > Aug 2 and Aug 9 and that acpi is not at fault. Try searching the cvs-all > archives between those dates (and perhaps narrowing the date more). To help narrow the date: I'm also seeing this problem on a Thinkpad A22p with -current from ~7pm on Aug 8. I just recently switched to -current so did not realize this was a new issue, and was trying to determine if I had a configuration error of some sort. In addition, I had one weird instance where the clock did the opposite and increased the speed by the same ratio. I haven't been able to reproduce this yet. (Maybe starting the system in a lower CPU speed setting and then stepping up would cause it. I will test this.) Let me know if you want me try anything or pass along configuration information. Bob Fleck