Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 18:21:50 +0530 From: <sivakumar.subramani@wipro.com> To: <mark@immermail.com>, <glebius@FreeBSD.org>, <brueffer@FreeBSD.org>, <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org> Subject: RE: netgraph with 10Gig interfaces Message-ID: <FBE865431BCF7D4C955E3BFE69E00551E87D73@blr-m3-msg.wipro.com> In-Reply-To: <44E09A29.2010909@immermail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Mark,
I have bge and fxp interface on the system. I enabled the NETGRAPH by
enabling the NETGRAPH in the config file and compiled the new kernel.
Then, booted with the new kernel.
fxp0: flags=3D8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
options=3D8<VLAN_MTU>
inet6 fe80::290:27ff:fe85:8b8c%fxp0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
inet 17.1.1.150 netmask 0xff000000 broadcast 17.255.255.255
ether 00:90:27:85:8b:8c
media: Ethernet autoselect (none)
status: no carrier
bge0: flags=3D8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
options=3D1a<TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING>
inet6 fe80::2e0:81ff:fe29:f38d%bge0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3
inet 10.114.52.152 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.114.52.255
ether 00:e0:81:29:f3:8d
media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>)
status: active
Even then I could not see the above interfaces listed in the output of
the list command of ngctl.
+ list -l
There are 2 total nodes:
Name: ngctl1088 Type: socket ID: 00000007 Num hooks:
0
Name: <unnamed> Type: eiface ID: 00000004 Num hooks:
0
+ list -n
There are 1 total named nodes:
Name: ngctl1088 Type: socket ID: 00000007 Num hooks:
0
+
But as per the document in the below link it is mentioned that network
interface by default should be listed in the output.=0D
http://ezine.daemonnews.org/200003/netgraph.html
Is that means these drivers are not supporting the netgraph?
Thanks,
~Siva
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of mark
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 9:14 PM
To: Gleb Smirnoff; Christian Brueffer; freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: netgraph with 10Gig interfaces
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 08:20:25AM -0700, mark wrote:
> m> It sounds like there's an assumption it's a driver problem. Note
> m> that the intel 10Gig driver (from Interl's website) also does not
work
> m> with netgraph (works fine otherwise though)
> m>=0D
> m> Is there something that drivers need to do to support netgraph?
>=0D
> All Ethernet interfaces should instantly be supported by ng_ether(4).
> ATM, I have no idea why you have problems with Neterion and Intel
> interfaces.
That's what I thought. Is there anything I can send along that
would be of use, such as ngctl output with debug on?
Mark
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to=
this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and=
may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you=
are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or=
copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all=
copies of this message and any attachments.=0D
WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient=
should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses.=
The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus=
transmitted by this email.
=0D
www.wipro.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?FBE865431BCF7D4C955E3BFE69E00551E87D73>