From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 9 10:28:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1765B16A4CE for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 10:28:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from pr93.lublin.sdi.tpnet.pl (pr93.lublin.sdi.tpnet.pl [217.97.36.93]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 525A843D46 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 10:28:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from michal@pasternak.w.lub.pl) Received: (qmail 87990 invoked by uid 1001); 9 Mar 2004 18:28:08 -0000 Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 19:28:08 +0100 From: Michal Pasternak To: Narvi Message-ID: <20040309182808.GA87855@pasternak.w.lub.pl> Mail-Followup-To: Narvi , Michal Pasternak , dashevil@sympatico.ca, freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org References: <20040308063951.VMBB16454.tomts6-srv.bellnexxia.net@smtp.bellnexxia.net> <20040308093604.GA37089@pasternak.w.lub.pl> <20040309144318.B68396@haldjas.folklore.ee> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040309144318.B68396@haldjas.folklore.ee> cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org cc: Michal Pasternak Subject: Re: Desktop FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Michal Pasternak List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 18:28:08 -0000 Narvi [Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 02:46:38PM +0200]: > > J. S. using some desktop Linux + Gnome + Abiword will not care what it > > really is, as long, as the computer acts like J. S. belives it should act. > > J. S. will propably notice the difference on other computers (using, for > > example, MS Windows + MS Office) - but he may still be unable to call this > > "different program". > > > > And this is entirely wrong and quite laughable You have an adorable sense of humour. > and shows that you haven't > ever bothered to look into the matter seriously. What you are doing is > akin to saying @and all blondes are stupid@ in a serious discussion. Even (especially?) those with a master degree can act silly when it comes to computer sometimes. I thought we are talking about desktops for ordinary computer users and useability issues for people, who are only interested in getting their job done (and, who are *not* interested in learning more about computers, than they really have). Perhaps you would like to elaborate some more on this topic, except for going personal, hm?