Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 16:36:40 +0200 From: rainer@ultra-secure.de To: "Andriy Gapon" <avg@icyb.net.ua> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8.1-RELEASE and cddl-sources from STABLE Message-ID: <1b1fd7c51699466c5acaf68516d01c6e.squirrel@webmail.ultra-secure.de> In-Reply-To: <4CCAD0AF.8080707@icyb.net.ua> References: <ab57553ca5f4ad33ab091924d72be95b.squirrel@webmail.ultra-secure.de> <4CCAC9FF.5020207@icyb.net.ua> <f3024e9897eb579ead47785ba08ac51e.squirrel@webmail.ultra-secure.de> <4CCAD0AF.8080707@icyb.net.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> on 29/10/2010 16:44 rainer@ultra-secure.de said the following: >>> on 29/10/2010 15:26 rainer@ultra-secure.de said the following: >>>> Does that actually make sense? >>>> Or should we just upgrade to STABLE and live with the problems? >>>> ;-) >>> >>> What problems? >> >> I don't know. >> If all was good, we wouldn't have to wait until January for RELEASE, >> right? >> ;-) > > Releases are produced based on time policy (e.g. every half a year), we > are not > waiting for anything in particular. Good to hear. >> Seriously, though, we have a policy to only install a release if it's >> called RELEASE. > > Even if you seriously mangle half a source tree by hand? - This is in > regard to > your original question. Yes, this concern is valid. > IMO, stable branch is the best release. Thanks for your input. Best Regards, Rainer
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1b1fd7c51699466c5acaf68516d01c6e.squirrel>